Few people and organizations are aware of the fact that there is
an ISO standard, ISO 10019, available which provides guidelines for the
selection of quality management system consultants and the use of their services.
The selection of a consultant is important for ensuring that the resulting quality management system is capable of meeting the organization’s planned objectives in an effective and efficient manner.
It is vitally important to remember that, even when the services
of a consultant is used, the involvement and commitment of top management are
key factors for the realization of a quality management system that is going to
be effective and add value to the organization.
ISO 10019 provides guidance on the factors to be taken into
consideration when selecting a quality management system consultant. The
organization is looking for a consultant who is able to meet their specific
needs, expectations and objectives.
Definitions
Quality management system realization: The
process of establishing, documenting, implementing, maintaining and continually
improving a quality management system.
Quality management consultant: A person who assists
the organization on quality management system realization, giving advice or
information.
The standard has two main sections:
- Clause 4: Selection of a
quality management consultant
- Clause 5: Use of the
quality management consultant’s services
Section 4, dealing with the selection of the consultant,
contains the following guidelines:
- 4.1 Inputs into the
selection process
- 4.1.1 Organization’s
needs and expectations
- 4.1.2 Role of the
consultants
- 4.1.3 Evaluation of the
competence of the consultant
- 4.2 Competence of the
consultant
- 4.2.1 General
- 4.2.2 Personal
attributes
- 4.2.3 Education,
knowledge and skills
- 4.2.4 Knowledge and
skills specific to quality management
- 4.2.4.1 Relevant
standards
- 4.2.4.2 National and
international certification / registration and accreditation systems
- 4.2.4.3 General quality
management principles, methodologies and techniques
- 4.2.5 Knowledge and
skills specific to the organizations
- 4.2.5.1 Statutory and
regulatory requirements
- 4.2.5.2 Product, process
and organizational requirements
- 4.2.5.3 Management
practices
- 4.2.6 Work experience
- 4.2.7 Maintenance and improvement
of competence
- 4.3 Ethical
considerations
Section 5, dealing with the use of the consultant’s services,
includes:
- 5.1 Consultant’s
services
- 5.2 Contract for
consultant’s services
- 5.3 Useful
considerations for the consultant’s services
Over the next few blogs, I would like to discuss the
requirements of this standard, as well as some additional information on the
use of quality management system consultants.
In this blog I would like to focus on some of the selection
criteria which organizations should consider when they decide to make use of
the services of a consultant.
The first consideration is the needs and expectations of the
organization itself. When selecting the consultant, the organization must know
its own expectations for the consultant, based on its overall objectives for
the realization of the quality management system. It will include factors like
the knowledge already available in the organization, the amount of benefit the
organization wishes to realize from the implementation of the system (some
organizations only want a certificate for the system, with little expectation
of real sustainability benefits for the organization, while on the other end of
the spectrum they are looking for maximum benefit in terms of strategic
planning, managing business risk, etc.). This means that top management must be
involved in the selection process.
Role of the consultant
The selection process must take into account the role of the
consultant. It generally includes:
a)
assisting the organization to ensure that the design and the implementation of
the quality management system is suited to the organization's culture,
characteristics, level of education and specific business environment;
b) illustrating the concepts concerning quality management in a clear
and understandable way throughout the organization, paying special attention to
the understanding and adoption of quality management principles;
c) communicating with all relevant individuals, at all levels,
involving them actively in the quality management system realization;
d) advising and supporting the organization in identifying the
appropriate processes needed for its quality management system and defining the
relative importance, sequence and interaction of those processes;
e) assisting the organization in identifying needs for
documentation essential to ensure the effective planning, operation and control
of its processes;
f) evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the quality
management system processes to stimulate the organization to look for
opportunities for improvement;
g) assisting in promoting a process approach and continual
improvement of the quality management system within the organization;
h) assisting in identifying the training needs to enable the
organization to maintain the quality management system;
i) assisting the organization, where applicable, to identify the
relationship between its quality management system and any other relevant
management system (e.g. environmental or occupational health and safety) and
facilitate the integration of such systems.
The next step is to evaluate the competence of the potential
consultants. This includes, for the specific industry sector, total work
experience, work experience in quality management and experience in the
implementation of a quality management system.
The company also has to look at the consultant’s personal
attributes. The organization must be able to work with him or her. Other things
to look at includes:
- Relevant education
- Knowledge and skills
necessary to meet the organization’s overall objectives for the quality
management system
- Work experience
- Ethical behaviour
More on these points will follow in later blogs.
Consultant competence can be shown as follows in terms of the
standard:
Generally important personal attributes of the consultant are:
a) ethical: fair, truthful, sincere, honest and discreet;
b) observant: constantly and actively aware of organizational
culture and values, physical surroundings and activities;
c) perceptive: aware of and able to understand the need for change
and improvement;
d) versatile: able to adapt to different situations and provide
alternative and creative solutions;
e) tenacious: persistent, focused on achieving objectives;
f) decisive: capable of reaching timely conclusions based on
logical reasoning and analysis;
g) self-reliant: able to act and function independently while
interacting effectively with others;
h) communicative: able to listen to, and effectively interface
with, all levels of an organization, confidently and with sensitivity to its
culture;
i) practical: realistic and flexible with good time management;
j) accountable: able to take responsibility for his/her own
actions;
k) facilitative: able to assist an organization's management and
employees through the quality management system realization.
Regards
Koos


Comments
Post a Comment