Working with a
Quality Management Consultant – Part 3
I our
discussions of making use of the services of a consultant to assist the company
with the design, development and implementation of a quality management system
(QMS), I would like to focus on the requirements of clause 5 of ISO 10019, Use
of the quality management system consult’s services.
·
Definition
of the objectives and requirements of the QMS (Ensure that the consultant takes
the context of the organization into account)
·
Carry
out an initial evaluation or gap analysis
·
Assist
with design and implementation planning
·
Help
with the design and development of the system
·
Give
assistance regarding the implementation of the QMS
·
Evaluate
the success of the implementation process (Internal audit of the implemented
QMS, or parts of the QMS during implementation)
·
Assistance
with ongoing training and maintenance of the system
·
Help
with the identification of improvement opportunities to improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of the system
It is
always a good idea to put a contract in place between the company and the
consultant (or consulting organization). It eliminates the possibility of later
disputes about services that were supposed to have been delivered, etc. This
contract must clearly define the scope of work (including the associated
outputs). It should contain realistic milestones and the associated outputs for
each milestone that are cost effective for the organization. The milestones and
associated outputs should be based on an initial identification of the
company’s needs, requirements and objectives presented by top management, as
well as relevant customer requirements, conformity requirements of relevant
standards, compliance with relevant statutory and regulatory requirements,
present managerial and operational processes and the difference between the
company’s current situation and the identified objectives that should be achieved.
Documentation
requirements of the standards, as well as the company’s own documentation
requirements should also be included.
The
contract must be written in a clear and unambiguous manner and should include
the following:
·
The
scope of the work to be done by the consultant
·
Planning
of the QMS consulting services
·
The
consultant’s and the company’s commitment, roles and responsibilities, as well
as the associated outputs
·
Commitment
of the company’s internal resources (This is extremely important because the
consultant cannot deliver his or her services without the total involvement of
the company and its personnel. The company does not want to end up with a
system that reflects the consultant’s thinking, but rather with its own, unique
QMS)
·
A
commitment form the company regarding the financial needs to support the
consultant’s activities
·
The
methods for monitoring progress and effectiveness
·
How
changes to the contract will be managed
·
Confidentiality
issues
·
Applicable
standards
·
Milestones
and delivery dates
·
Terms
of payment
·
Time
frames
The
standard gives us an example of the realization process for a quality
management system:
|
Activity |
Responsibility |
|
1. Information to top management of the main requirements
of the relevant quality management system standard, and the roles of the
organization and the consultant in quality management system design and |
Consultant |
|
2. Analysis of the needs and expectations of the
organization's customers and other interested parties. NOTE
The results of the initial evaluation are generally used: a)
to establish the organization's strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and
threats, f) for the establishment of measurable objectives. |
Organization's top management (consultant can provide
|
|
3. Appointment of a management representative and the
establishment of definitions of policy, objectives and commitments for
quality. Reference of such objectives to appropriate levels and functions within the organization. |
Organization's top management (consultant can provide
|
|
4. In-depth analysis of organizational structure,
processes, channels of communication and existing interfaces. Identification of the processes and responsibilities needed to achieve the quality objectives. Definition of sequence and interactions among such processes. |
Management representative and consultant, with the
|
|
5. Set up of a plan for defining the quality management
system architecture and for identifying and developing the procedures needed
for the quality management system. To assess the progress and quality of the
implemented a) consistency between what has been prepared and developed and the contractual objectives, b) work progress, and
c)
satisfaction of the organization (with regard to the services provided by the
quality management system |
Management representative and consultant
|
|
6. Review of the results of the analysis carried out
and of the plan prepared in advance. |
Organization's top management and consultant |
|
7. Identification of internal resources needed to
achieve the organization's quality objectives. |
Organization (consultant can provide assistance) |
|
8. Training of the persons responsible for developing
activities for the quality management system realization, and of the
organization's other personnel (“facilitators”) involved. |
Management representative and consultant |
|
9. Identification and definition of processes,
interrelation of processes and preparation of the necessary procedures,
including procedures for record maintenance. |
Management representative (consultant can provide |
|
10. Alignment of interrelated processes and
relevant procedures to avoid any
inconsistencies, gaps and overlaps |
Management representative and consultant. |
|
11. Elaboration of the final version of the quality
manual. |
Management representative (consultant can provide |
|
12. Training of all personnel involved with the
quality |
Consultant and management representative, or
management |
|
At this point the activities of the consultant stops, unless further assistance has been or is contracted at this point |
|
|
Implementation of the quality management system. |
Organization (consultant can provide assistance) |
|
|
|
The standard also gives an example of implementation support for the QMS:
|
Description of
activity |
Responsibility |
|
1. Training of internal auditors, emphasizing
auditing concepts, |
Consultant (or other providers of training appointed
by the organization) |
|
2. Development of a program for internal audits. |
Management representative and consultant |
|
3. Participation in an initial series of internal
audits, together |
Consultant |
|
4. Assisting top management in conducting effective |
Consultant |
|
5. Assisting with any implementation difficulties,
focusing on |
Consultant |
|
6. Continual improvement of the implementation
process. |
Organization's top management (consultant can provide
assistance) |
|
7. Information about certification issues, if
required, including |
Consultant |
Meetings
should be conducted to evaluate the progress in implementing the system and the
performance of the consultant. Include evaluation in terms of the plan and the
budget for the QMS realization activities. Documented progress reports should
be submitted to top management, if applicable.
It is
important to ensure that the implemented QMS is not a generic system based on
the opinions of the consultant. It must be based on the individual needs of the
company, based on context, risks and opportunities. The consultant therefore
cannot design and develop the system in isolation. It is a concerted effort
between the consultant and the relevant personnel of the company.
Consider
the following as far as the consultant’s services are concerned:
·
The
resulting system should not generate unnecessary administration and
documentation
·
The
success of the QMS depends mainly on the involvement and commitment of
leadership in the company, and not on the consultant alone
·
The
company should assign a staff ember to coordinate and monitor the consultant’s
activities (normally the person who will be responsible for maintaining the
QMS)
·
Employees
are involved at all levels in order to integrate the QMS within the company’s
overall operations
·
The
consultant should be empowered to interact with the company’s management and
employees at all levels in order to appraise the company processes
·
Even
in the case where QMS consulting was in response to contractual or market
requirements, there is an opportunity to use the resulting QMS as an effective
and efficient management tool
·
There
is the potential for the QMS to provide a basis for continual improvement of
the company’s performance
·
The
consulting service should be compatible with the company’s culture, the
competence of employees and existing processes and / or documentation.
Remember
that the consultant is there to assist with the development of the QMS, not to
do it for the company! The resulting system is that of the company, not the
consultant.
The
information contained in ISO 10019 are guidelines for the use of a quality
management consultant. But these principles can be applied to any consultant
and their services that the company needs to employ.
I hope that
he information is helpful, and that the use of consultants in your business
will be pleasant experiences!
Please feel
free to drop me an e-mail at koosgouws10@gmail.com for more information or advice. You
can also visit our website at www.sheqmanagementsystem.com, or alternatively, at www.sheq-management-systems.webnode.com.
Koos

Comments
Post a Comment